http://blog.rongarret.info
1 day ago
-
Rondam Ramblings
▲ | and unintuitive: it is possible to decompose a sphere into a finite number of parts that can be reassembled to produce two spheres, |
▲ | induction is this: we are finite beings. There are only a finite number of us humans. Each of us only lives for a |
▲ | finite amount of time, during which we can only have a finite number of experiences and collect a finite amount of data. How |
▲ | terms of properties of physical objects because we live in a finite universe. There are not an infinite number of objects, so if |
▲ | not possibly designate any meaningful quantity of physical objects in our finite universe. It the Banach-Tarski paradox "true"? It depends on whether |
http://langsoul.com
1 day ago
-
The Language Of My Soul Blog
▲ | mixed up with strategy. Real strategy is achieving a challenge with finite resources, it’s HOW you’ll accomplish something, not the WHAT |
▲ | a real strategy is accomplishing a set challenge or task with finite resources, it’s not WHAT we are doing, but HOW are |
▲ | and a real strategy to achieve a challenge or objective with finite resources. Let’s use this blog as a case study, the |
▲ | believe he was so entitled that I should fork out my finite funds for his needs? Even more so when there’s government |
▲ | my life. It also elevated my meals out. Because of how finite my funds are, because of how my meals must be extremely |
http://forwardscattering.org
1 day ago
-
Forward Scattering - The Weblog of Nicholas Chapman
▲ | To prove this, we will first show that there is a finite number of effectively-different Turing machines that need to be considered. |
▲ | using the \(M\) states. The number of such Turing machines is finite, and bounded by a exponential function of \(M\) and \(|\Gamma|\). For |
▲ | of functions we deal with in computer programs are defined on finite domains, especially functions that take as input finite precision integers or |
▲ | finding the fastest Turing machine to compute a function with a finite domain Posted 8 Feb 2014 Let's say we have some (total) |
▲ | Let's say we have some (total) function \(f\), defined on some finite domain \(A\): $$ f : A \mapsto B $$ For example, f might be |
▲ | finding the fastest Turing machine that computes a function f with finite domain. The fastest Turing machine takes just 1 step. Proof: To |
▲ | machine that computes the given function \(f\), where \(f\) has a finite domain. Let's also say that we have some 'reference' Turing machine \( |
http://lagomor.ph
1 day ago
-
Lagomorph | Home
▲ | a destabilizing era of remakes and reboots. Crucially, nostalgia is a finite resource, and its exhaustion bears unknown consequences. Jean Baudrillard’s notions |
http://petr-mitrichev.blogspot.com
1 day ago
-
Algorithms Weekly by Petr Mitrichev
▲ | a ( u )+ h ( u )* b ( u ). The right side involves a finite number of different integers in denominators, so this equality will also |
http://christopher-beckham.github.io
1 day ago
▲ | arXiv:2302.07400. tldr: Most generative models are defined on a finite number of dimensions, and this is also true for diffusion models. |
http://www.jsloop.net
1 day ago
-
jsloop | {musings}
▲ | musings} jsloop {musings} Home Categories Tags API Tester Pro Code About Finite State Machine for UI State Transitions using GameplayKit 2024-06-30 |
http://frominsidethebox.com
1 day ago
-
Thoughts from Inside the Box
▲ | Time. We inhabit our respective mortal coils for a short and finite amount of it. It flies by. We never have enough of |
http://blog.janetacarr.com
2 days ago
-
Clojurian Thought: A Clojure programming language blog
▲ | explanatory here, and these states imply each job function is a Finite-State-Machine (FSM). All work, no play So, I need to |
▲ | FSM). All work, no play So, I need to implement a Finite-State-Machine in Clojure. If you've read any of my previous |
▲ | coming next: Functions returning functions. In short, we can implement a finite state machine by having a function represent each state. When a |
https://blog.janetacarr.com
1 month ago
-
Clojurian Thought: A Clojure programming language blog
▲ | explanatory here, and these states imply each job function is a Finite-State-Machine (FSM). All work, no play So, I need to |
▲ | FSM). All work, no play So, I need to implement a Finite-State-Machine in Clojure. If you've read any of my previous |
▲ | coming next: Functions returning functions. In short, we can implement a finite state machine by having a function represent each state. When a |